Agricultural equipment finance

What's the best way to finance agricultural equipment?

Most farms and agricultural contractors use hire purchase to finance tractors, combines and handlers, because these machines are built to run for a decade or more and the business wants to own them outright once the term ends. Because farm income is seasonal, concentrated around harvest or livestock sales rather than spread evenly, lenders on a broker panel will often structure seasonal or deferred repayments so instalments fall when the farm is actually being paid, not on a flat monthly schedule that ignores the calendar.

Buyers in this category range from a single-person livestock or arable holding to agricultural contractors running a fleet across several farms. What they have in common is a working pattern set by the growing season rather than the calendar month: machinery has to be in the field or the yard at a specific point in the year, and a breakdown or a late delivery in that window costs far more than the finance would. Financing rather than buying outright keeps cash free for seed, feed and fuel through the months when the farm has no income coming in at all.

Hire purchase is the usual fit for tractors, combines and general farm machinery, because these are long-life assets a farm typically wants to keep, run hard and eventually own outright rather than hand back. Leasing suits equipment where the technology moves faster than the machine itself wears out, such as GPS guidance and precision-application systems fitted to otherwise conventional kit. Where the item is closer to a fixed structure than a machine, such as a grain store or livestock building, a secured loan against the business is usually the better route than asset finance built for moveable plant.

Tractors and mainstream farm machinery have one of the deepest used markets in UK agriculture, with strong demand from smaller farms buying down and dealers exporting older stock, which keeps lenders comfortable financing both new and used equipment. Specialist implements and one-off attachments have a much thinner resale market, so a lender is more likely to look at the trading history of the farm business itself when the asset alone would not cover the debt if things went wrong.

The mistake we see most often is treating the finance term as a formality and letting a lender default to level monthly repayments, when farm income genuinely is not level. A facility structured around the farm's actual cash flow, whether that means bigger payments after harvest and smaller ones before it, or a payment holiday built in for a known quiet period, costs the same overall but is far easier to service without dipping into an overdraft to cover a fixed instalment in a month with no income.

People also ask