Lendus.

What are the best alternatives to Atelier Finance?

Written by the Lendus editorial team. Last updated .

In short

The best Atelier Finance alternatives include Magnet Capital for schemes from £500,000 including first-time developers, CrowdProperty for a published monthly rate from £200,000, Avamore Capital for less experienced developers from £250,000, Hampshire Trust Bank for bank-backed lending to £35 million, OakNorth for bespoke facilities from £1 million, Octopus Real Estate for schemes up to £100 million, and LendInvest for loans from £75,000.

Why consider alternatives to Atelier Finance?

Atelier Finance, trading through Atelier Capital Partners Limited, is a London development and bridging lender built for the upper end of the market. It writes bespoke loans of £3,000,000 to £40,000,000 across residential, purpose-built student accommodation, build-to-rent, care and bridging, at Bank of England Base Rate plus a margin of 4.99% to 6.99%. Gearing is generous, up to 90% loan-to-cost and up to 70% loan-to-gross-development-value, interest is charged daily so you pay only for time drawn, and a dedicated drawdown team handles staged releases through the build.

For a professional developer running a £12,000,000 scheme, that is a well-designed product. The reasons developers end up looking elsewhere are almost always about eligibility rather than quality.

The floor is the first and biggest. £3,000,000 is where Atelier starts, which excludes most UK residential development outright.

The track record requirement is the second. Atelier targets professional developers with a demonstrable record of similar completed developments and is explicitly not suited to first-time developers.

Base rate exposure is third. Pricing is a margin over Bank of England Base Rate rather than a fixed rate, so a build programme running through a rate cycle carries that risk.

Certainty is fourth. Atelier publishes no fixed rate card and no guaranteed approval speed, so exact cost and timing require a direct enquiry on every scheme.

Regulation is fifth. The development and bridging products are unregulated exempt agreements, so borrowers do not get FCA consumer protections on these loans.

The seven lenders below each solve one of those problems, and the list is ordered by the one that blocks the most developers: loan size.

Top Atelier Finance alternatives

1. Magnet Capital, best for schemes under £3 million and first-time developers

Magnet Capital does exactly the thing Atelier will not. It funds ground-up development, light and heavy refurbishment and conversion schemes from £500,000 to £4,000,000, six times below Atelier’s entry point, and it states that first-time developers can secure funding where the project is well-structured. Gearing is competitive at up to 65% loan-to-GDV and up to 90% loan-to-cost, matching Atelier on the loan-to-cost side. A decision in principle is often available within minutes of receiving key project information, and stage payments are released within 48 hours of a site inspection.

Rates and amounts: no standard rate range published; interest is typically calculated on a rolled-up basis with an option to service monthly, and pricing is assessed per project and confirmed on application; £500,000 to £4,000,000.

Eligibility: no minimum trading history stated; first-time developers considered where the project is well-structured; no published turnover requirement.

Timeline: decision in principle often within minutes; typical timeline from sign-up to completion is 6 to 10 weeks.

Regulatory status: Magnet Capital Limited states on its own website that it is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority under firm reference number 827220, while describing its ground-up development and refurbishment finance as unregulated development finance for business-purpose projects. It is a member of the Bridging and Development Lenders Association.

Beats Atelier on: minimum loan size and developer experience. Its £4,000,000 ceiling is a tenth of Atelier’s, so it does not scale with you, and it publishes no rates.


2. CrowdProperty, best for a published monthly rate

CrowdProperty is the only lender on this panel that publishes an actual development finance rate range, 0.65% to 1.1% per month, so you can model finance cost across the programme before you apply rather than after. It funds residential and mixed-use schemes from £200,000 to £10,000,000, was founded by property development professionals, and holds the highest Trustpilot rating of any UK development finance provider on our panel at 4.9 from more than 320 reviews. Indicative terms come within 48 hours and a full credit decision within 2 weeks.

Rates and amounts: 0.65% to 1.1% per month for development finance, with arrangement fees typically 2% of the loan; £200,000 to £10,000,000.

Eligibility: no trading history required; development experience matters more than trading history; no turnover requirement.

Timeline: indicative terms within 48 hours, full credit decision within 2 weeks, drawdown from 4 weeks.

Regulatory status: CrowdProperty Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, firm reference number 723959.

Beats Atelier on: pricing transparency and a £200,000 entry point. It funds residential and mixed-use only, so commercial development is out of scope, it is less suitable for first-time developers without a completed project, and because it is part-funded by retail investors, timelines depend on investor appetite.


3. Avamore Capital, best for less experienced developers on larger schemes

Avamore bridges the gap between Magnet Capital’s accessibility and Atelier’s scale. It lends £250,000 to £25,000,000 across bridging, ground-up development, part-complete development, refurbishment and purpose-built student accommodation, and states that development finance is available to less experienced developers rather than only those with an established track record. It is also unusually flexible on borrower profile, explicitly considering foreign and overseas resident borrowers and complicated equity structures, and it says it is flexible on personal guarantees.

Rates and amounts: bridging from 0.56% per month with Bank of England Base Rate added to the Avamore rate and fixed for the life of the loan; development finance quoted separately from 6.75% per annum plus base rate; no maximum rate is published as each loan is priced individually; £250,000 to £25,000,000, with ground-up development from £500,000.

Eligibility: no minimum trading history or turnover published; lending is assessed on the property, the loan-to-value or loan-to-GDV, and the exit strategy.

Timeline: bridging typically within 3 to 4 days; refurbishment finance often approved within 24 hours.

Regulatory status: Avamore Capital is not FCA-authorised. It states on its own website that it is a provider of unregulated loans to corporate entities and private individuals, and that any loans made to private individuals comply with the exemptions set out in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001.

Beats Atelier on: entry point, developer experience and a fixed base rate at drawdown rather than a floating one. Development lending is restricted to mainland England and Wales, so Scotland and Northern Ireland are out.


4. Hampshire Trust Bank, best for a bank balance sheet on a large scheme

If the concern is that Atelier is an unregulated specialist rather than a bank, Hampshire Trust Bank is the answer at similar scale. It is a full UK deposit-taking bank with a per-customer lending ceiling of £35,000,000 across bridging, specialist mortgages and development finance, close to Atelier’s £40,000,000, and it publishes no minimum loan size, so smaller schemes can at least be discussed. Bridging completions are targeted within 21 days with dual legal representation, and there are no early repayment charges on bridging.

Rates and amounts: rates are not published for direct comparison; bridging, development finance and specialist mortgage pricing is provided via rate cards issued to registered brokers through the PUMA intermediary portal; no minimum loan size published, maximum £35,000,000.

Eligibility: no minimum published; HTB lends only through registered intermediaries and assesses each case individually rather than against a fixed trading history rule.

Regulatory status: Hampshire Trust Bank Plc is a full UK bank, authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by both the Financial Conduct Authority and the PRA, firm reference number 204601. Customer deposits are protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

Beats Atelier on: bank status, no published minimum loan size and a stated bridging completion target of 21 days where Atelier publishes no turnaround at all. You cannot apply directly, so you need a registered broker, and rates are only visible through broker rate cards.


5. OakNorth Bank, best for bespoke facilities from £1 million

OakNorth is a UK bank that lends from £1,000,000 with no published maximum, funding property development, real estate investment, acquisition finance and fund finance. Every facility is individually underwritten rather than credit-scored, and OakNorth states it can fund partners within weeks rather than months and in some cases within days. For a developer whose scheme sits between £1,000,000 and £3,000,000, this is the only bank on the panel that will look at it on a bespoke basis rather than through a rate card.

Rates and amounts: no standard rate range published; pricing is individually assessed per deal based on trading history, turnover, profitability and EBITDA; from £1,000,000, with the maximum described only as tens of millions.

Eligibility: no fixed minimum trading history or turnover published; both are assessed case by case as part of underwriting.

Regulatory status: OakNorth Bank plc is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority, Financial Services Register number 629564.

Beats Atelier on: a £1,000,000 entry point from a regulated bank, and a wider set of deal types including acquisitions and fund finance. It publishes no rates and no guaranteed decision timescale, so you cannot benchmark before applying.


6. Octopus Real Estate, best for the largest schemes and green incentives

Octopus is where you go when Atelier’s £40,000,000 ceiling is the constraint. Its development loans run from £5,000,000 up to £100,000,000, among the largest limits of any UK specialist real estate lender, backed by Octopus Group’s institutional funding lines. It is also the only lender here offering a genuine sustainability incentive, with a rate discount of up to 0.15% per month available on bridging and development loans that improve a property’s EPC rating, plus a dedicated Greener Homes Alliance development product. It offers both regulated and unregulated bridging from the same lender.

Rates and amounts: residential bridging from 0.55% per month and commercial bridging from 0.85% per month, with no ceiling rate published; development and refurbishment loan rates are not published; £50,000 to £100,000,000, with a £1,000,000 minimum on commercial bridging.

Eligibility: no minimum trading history or turnover published; lending is assessed against the security property, the development scheme and the exit strategy, and newly formed special purpose vehicles are commonly used.

Regulatory status: Octopus Investments Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, firm reference number 194779. Residential bridging secured on a property the borrower lives in or intends to live in is offered on a regulated basis; commercial bridging, development finance and buy-to-let mortgages for investment purposes are provided on an unregulated basis.

Beats Atelier on: maximum scheme size and the EPC rate discount. Development starts at £5,000,000, higher than Atelier’s £3,000,000, so this is a step up rather than a step down.


7. LendInvest, best for the smallest development requirements

LendInvest is the lowest entry point on this panel at £75,000, forty times below Atelier’s floor, and it lends up to £15,000,000 across bridging, development finance and commercial mortgages. It is an AIM-listed technology-driven lender with published bridging pricing of 0.54% to 1.2% per month and development finance from 7% per annum, and it turns credit decisions around in 24 to 48 hours with legal completion in 2 to 4 weeks. For a small residential conversion or a single-plot scheme, it is often the only realistic route on this list.

Rates and amounts: bridging 0.54% to 1.2% per month, development finance from 7% per annum; £75,000 to £15,000,000.

Eligibility: no trading history required for property-backed lending, and no turnover requirement, but development finance requires demonstrable developer experience.

Timeline: credit decision within 24 to 48 hours; legal completion 2 to 4 weeks.

Regulatory status: Lendus has not independently verified LendInvest’s regulatory position from a primary source, so no FCA claim is made here. Check LendInvest on the FCA Register at register.fca.org.uk before committing.

Beats Atelier on: minimum loan size and decision speed. Arrangement and exit fees can add meaningfully to total cost, and it is less flexible than some specialists on complex adverse credit.


Comparison table

LenderDevelopment amountRateFirst-time developersSpeed
Atelier Finance£3,000,000 to £40,000,000BBR+4.99% to BBR+6.99% p.a.NoNot published
Magnet Capital£500,000 to £4,000,000Not publishedYes, if well-structuredDIP within minutes
CrowdProperty£200,000 to £10,000,0000.65% to 1.1% per monthLess suitableTerms within 48 hours
Avamore Capital£500,000 to £25,000,000From 6.75% p.a. plus BBRLess experienced consideredRefurb within 24 hours
Hampshire Trust BankUp to £35,000,000Broker rate cards onlyNot publishedBridging target 21 days
OakNorth BankFrom £1,000,000Not publishedNot publishedWeeks, sometimes days
Octopus Real Estate£5,000,000 to £100,000,000Not published for developmentNot publishedNot published
LendInvest£75,000 to £15,000,000From 7% p.a.Experience requiredDecision 24 to 48 hours

Monthly rates and annual rates are different units and cannot be compared directly. Where a rate is quoted over Bank of England Base Rate, the all-in cost depends on the prevailing base rate.

How to choose

Choose Magnet Capital if your scheme needs £500,000 to £4,000,000 and this is one of your first developments.

Choose CrowdProperty if it is residential or mixed-use and you want a monthly rate you can put into a cash flow model today.

Choose Avamore Capital if you need more than £4,000,000, are not yet an established developer, and your site is in mainland England or Wales.

Choose Hampshire Trust Bank if you want a PRA-authorised bank on a large scheme and you already work with a registered broker.

Choose OakNorth if the requirement sits between £1,000,000 and £3,000,000 and the deal has features a rate card cannot accommodate.

Choose Octopus Real Estate if the scheme is above £40,000,000, or if an EPC improvement means the 0.15% per month discount is genuinely available to you.

Choose LendInvest if the requirement is under £500,000 and no other lender on this list will look at it.

A final point specific to development finance. Because interest on most of these facilities is charged on drawn funds over the build programme, the headline rate matters less than the drawdown schedule and how quickly your lender releases stage payments. Magnet Capital releases within 48 hours of a site inspection and Atelier runs a dedicated drawdown team. Ask about that process before you commit, because a slow drawdown on a cheap facility costs more than a fast drawdown on an expensive one.

Need development finance? Compare specialist lenders.

Check Eligibility

Frequently asked questions

Why do developers look for Atelier Finance alternatives?
Two reasons dominate, and both are about who Atelier is built for. The minimum loan is £3,000,000, which rules out the large majority of UK residential schemes before any other criterion is considered. Alongside that, Atelier targets professional developers with a demonstrable track record of similar completed developments, so a first or second scheme rarely clears the bar however well structured it is. A third reason is pricing certainty. Atelier quotes as Bank of England Base Rate plus a margin of 4.99% to 6.99%, so the cost of the facility moves with base rate over the build.
Which alternative has the lowest minimum loan?
LendInvest at £75,000, then CrowdProperty at £200,000 and Avamore Capital at £250,000 for bridging and refurbishment. Magnet Capital starts at £500,000 for ground-up development, and Avamore's ground-up development also starts at £500,000. That range matters because it is the single biggest practical difference between these lenders and Atelier. A developer with a four-unit residential scheme needing £900,000 has five workable options on this panel and none of them is Atelier, whose floor sits more than three times above that requirement.
Which lenders will fund a first-time developer?
Magnet Capital states that first-time developers can secure funding if the project itself is well-structured, and it publishes no minimum trading history. Avamore Capital states that its development finance is available to less experienced developers and that it is flexible on personal guarantees, foreign and overseas resident borrowers and complicated equity structures. Beyond those two, expect experience to be tested. CrowdProperty is explicitly less suitable for first-time developers without a completed project, and LendInvest's development finance requires demonstrable developer experience. Atelier itself is not suited to first-time developers at all.
Which alternative can fund the largest scheme?
Octopus Real Estate, with development loans from £5,000,000 up to £100,000,000, two and a half times Atelier's £40,000,000 ceiling. Hampshire Trust Bank has a per-customer ceiling of £35,000,000 across bridging, specialist mortgages and development finance. OakNorth lends from £1,000,000 with no published maximum, describing it only as tens of millions of pounds. Avamore Capital goes to £25,000,000 on bridging. If your scheme genuinely needs more than £40,000,000 of senior debt, Octopus and OakNorth are the two on this panel with the stated capacity for it.
Is development finance FCA regulated?
Usually not, because it is business-purpose lending against a development scheme rather than consumer borrowing. Atelier Capital Partners Limited states plainly that it is not authorised by the FCA and that its loans are exempt agreements, with FCA registration for anti-money laundering supervision only under registration number 910090. Avamore Capital is also not FCA-authorised. CrowdProperty Ltd is FCA authorised and regulated under FRN 723959, Octopus Investments Limited under FRN 194779, Hampshire Trust Bank Plc under FRN 204601 and OakNorth Bank plc under register number 629564, but authorisation of the firm does not mean the development loan itself is a regulated product. Check every lender at register.fca.org.uk.
Should I take a fixed margin over base rate or a fixed monthly rate?
It depends how long your build runs and what you think base rate will do. Atelier and Avamore both price over Bank of England Base Rate, so your interest cost tracks policy across an 18 or 24 month programme, for better or worse. CrowdProperty publishes a fixed monthly rate of 0.65% to 1.1% for development finance, so the cost is knowable from day one. On a long scheme the difference can be material either way, which is why it is worth asking every lender to model total finance cost over your actual programme length rather than comparing headline rates.

Related finance products

Need development finance? Compare specialist lenders.

Check eligibility in 2 minutes. No credit check.

Check Eligibility →
Check Eligibility, 2 min, no credit check